| (Score:
score with one [1] point for a “Yes” answer and zero
[0] for a “No” answer) |
|
|
Typically
customer deciding on a strategy and IT systems realizing it,
there is a difference of at least 8 to12 months. In your case,
there are no such gaps. |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have identified the top 5 significant decisions that can adversely
impact your software system, selection of the structural elements
and their interfaces in next 6 months, 12 months & 3 years
|
[
]
|
|
|
You
are aware of the 10 key issues that govern COMPOSITION of your
software structural and behavioral elements into larger subsystem |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have built traceability between business requirements, system
requirements and technology requirements |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have a framework in place to map Business Process to Function
matrix and its mapping to component & service granularity
|
[
]
|
|
|
You
have guidelines about architectural styles that is being used
in your system for taking care of functionality, performance,
resilience, reuse, technology trade-offs, aesthetic concerns
and economic constraints |
[
]
|
|
|
Although
each component has a life of 6 –18 month ONLY, you have
a well-defined architecture framework, reference models in place
to ensure system life of 8 to 10 years |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have a “technology refresh” mechanism in place to
enable replacement of obsolete component / technology during
development lifecycle of the product/system itself. |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have a matrix in place to measure dependency between performance
parameters and the component modifiability? |
[
]
|
|
|
You
know which methods in your systems are consuming too much CPU
and/or Transaction Time? |
[
]
|
|
|
You
know which SQL statements are consuming too much Transaction
Time |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have design trades/analysis support verification of Non-Functional
(QoS) Requirements |
[
]
|
|
|
You
have matrix in place for measuring reusable assets (asset type,
development hours, no of trial usage, actual deployments, no
of rejections, hours saved by reusing asset, asset adoption
percentage). Of course, you have already implemented Reusable
asset repository. |
[
]
|
|
|
Total
Score
|
[
]
|
